Dino Loses Appeal as Court Orders Fresh Election in 90 Days
The
senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District at the National Assembly,
Senator Dino Melaye, yesterday suffered a setback as the Court of Appeal
dismissed his suit challenging his sack from the National
Assembly. A three man panel of the appellate court in a judgment
delivered, upheld the decision of the Kogi State National Assembly Election
Petition Tribunal which nullified the election of Melaye as Senator
representing Kogi West Senatorial District on account of manifest electoral
malpractices.
Melaye had approached the
Court of Appeal to set aside the majority judgment of the tribunal which
nullified his victory in the February 23 senatorial election and ordered for a
fresh election within 90 days.
In
the appeal, Melaye claimed that the tribunal erred in law when it reached a
decision based on hearsay to nullify his election.
He therefore asked the
appellate court to set aside the tribunal’s judgment and upheld his election as
Senator representing Kogi West Senatorial District.
However
delivering judgment in the appeal, the three-man panel of Justices of the Court
of Appeal led by Justice Abubakar Yahaya upheld the decision of the tribunal
and ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a
fresh election within 90 days.
In the unanimous judgment
delivered by Justice Mohammed Idris, the appellate court held that the election
was invalid due to fundamental error by INEC which in the result sheets fixed
February 25 as date the senatorial election was conducted rather than February
23 the actual date the election held.
Melaye through his lawyer Dr.
Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), had urged the Appeal Court to set aside the over-voting
decision of the tribunal because it was based on hearsay instead of polling
units agents’ result.
The counsel drew the
attention of the Justices to the fact that only three witnesses were called,
adding that the evidence of the three witnesses based on hearsay could not
justify the cancellation of the senatorial election.
Ikpeazu further submitted
that mutilation of result sheet was untenable because the final result of
senatorial election was endorsed by agents of the candidates and the parties,
and that the petitioners failed to establish that the alleged mutilated result
substantially affected the final result collation.
Similarly, the other
appellants PDP and INEC had urged the court to set aside the majority judgment
on the grounds that they were denied fair hearing and were not allowed to
evaluate evidence adduced during the hearing.
According to the PDP, the
tribunal erred in law when it based its claim of over voting on the number of
collected permanent voter cards rather than voter register as required by law.
For more details, get This
Day newspaper.
Comments
Post a Comment