The Petroleum Industry Bill, PIB, passed by the 7th House may have been a pseudo bill
The
Petroleum Industry Bill, PIB, passed by the 7th House of Representatives
at the expiration of its tenure may have been a pseudo bill, as the one
approved by the Federal Executive Council under former President Jonathan’s
administration was not the one passed over to the National Assembly.
Indications
to this effect emerged, yesterday, in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, when then
Chairman of the extant PIB Committee, Mr. Osten Olorunsola, denied authenticity
of the bill.
The
revelation came even as participants at the forum reiterated the need for
urgent passage of the petroleum reform bill to cushion current challenges
occasioned by falling oil prices, dwindling revenues, devaluation of the Naira,
high interest rates, and worse still the nose-diving of Nigeria’s reserves for
the first time in the history of the economy.
Olorunsola,
a former Director, Department of Petroleum Resources, DPR, petroleum industry
regulator, spoke to journalists on the sidelines of a two-day National
Petroleum & Power Policy Forum, NPPPF, which opened at the Emerald Energy
Institute, University of Port Harcourt.
This
revelation seems to confirm widespread allegations and criticisms that the PIB
drafted by the committee was doctored to suit political interests.
Olorunsola,
who broke his silence for the first time since his removal from DPR said:
“Although the House of Reps passed the PIB, we do not know the details of what
they have passed. But one thing I can say for sure is that PIB was not the one
approved by Mr President during the FEC meeting.”
Probed
further, he recalled: “The PIB approved by the FEC was not what was submitted
to the National Assembly. As at the point of submission to the National
Assembly, there were a lot of alterations, and I could see those alterations
because I still have the original copy with me and the copy submitted to the
Assembly. So there was a lot of alterations and some of the clauses were either
reworked or amended by the National Assembly.
“Unfortunately,
we have not seen exactly what the House of Reps claimed they had passed, but
that is water under the bridge now anyway, because a new process has to be
restarted.”
Against the
current economic woes, and the fact that the PIB had stalled in a process that
lasted 15 years without being passed, stakeholders warned that if the petroleum
industry reform is not concluded urgently, the Nigerian economy is in for even
harsher times.
The Vice
Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, Emerald Energy Resources, co-organisers of
the forum, Dr. Jude Amaefule, said rather than delaying further in view of the
dire consequences on the economy, the PIB should be broken and passed in
segments.
He suggested
that since the contentious proposals make up only about 20 per cent of the
entire bill, the bill can be segmented along the lines of fiscal management,
host community benefits and general industry operations.
He said:
“Let’s pass the bill in segments since 80 per cent of the provisions are
favourable. Even the remaining 20 per cent were opposed because the people did
not understand the provisions.
“When we
said host community compensation, they thought we wanted to empower the people
of the Niger Delta more, but the provision is that if a pipeline passed through
your land, at the end of the month you get a cheque as compensation even if you
are not in the Niger Delta.
“The
industry is high capital expenditure and we are losing money daily because no
new investment is coming in and it will get worse if we don’t act fast.”
Prof. Yinka
Omoregbe, a member of the former Oil and Gas Industry Committee, OGIC, which
started the reform process under former President Olusegun Obansanjo, accused
the political leaders of selfishness and lack of will to see the reforms
through for the benefit of all.
She said
despite the fact that there have been multiple versions of the bill, there have
actually been only two PIBs presented to the National Assembly in the 15 year
band.
Omoregbe,
who was also removed unceremoniously as the Company Secretary, Nigerian
National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, also blamed the corporation for most of
the confusions that trailed the PIB at the Assembly, as it was the most
affected by the reforms, which it resisted.
She said:
“Let me clarify that there have only been two PIBs. The first one, which is the
original bill, was put in 2008, and the revised one of 2012. All that
transpired were still part of that; so there was a Senate bill and a House of
Reps bill.
“And the
proliferation was because of the openings that were noticed because the fiscals
were poor. Dr. Rilwani Lukman said we should go in and ensure that some things
were done especially for the PSCs, which created the opening for the whole bill
to under redrafting and redrafting and so on.”
“Make no
mistake, there was the highest sense of commitment by then President Yar’Adua
for the reforms and Dr. Lukman abided by that. Primarily the problem was more
with the institutions, so to speak, particularly the NNPC, plus the politicians
that opened the door for the proliferation. NNPC thought that whatever they
presented will be passed but that was not the case.”
Comments
Post a Comment