The ideas of Bisi Akande
Elder Statesman, Chief Bisi Akande was
Executive Governor of Osun
State for four years from
1999 during which he led his colleagues who were unwilling to pay workers the
National Minimum Wage. I was then in the Nigeria Labour Congress, and we
went to appeal to him to change his mind. He was adamant, so we left him to
engage in a grueling match with the workers which lasted his entire tenure. It
became so bad that he found it difficult staying in the state capital because
he was booed everywhere. The state workers were a principal factor in his
failure to secure a second term.
At his seventy seventh birthday this January, he addressed the current issue of non-payment of wages by half of the states in the country. The solution he said is for unviable states to cease to exist or be merged with viable ones. He did not explain how the issue of unpaid salaries will be solved if debtor states cease to exist. Will the workers also cease to exist; disappear or such states will file for bankruptcy and the wages will be part of the liabilities?
When he suggested that unviable states should be merged with viable ones, I wonder how many states are really viable outsideLagos . Assuming as many as five states are
viable, wont merging them with thirty one unviable ones lead to their collapse?
In any case, how does this address the issue of unpaid salaries or is he
advocating massive retrenchment? He went on to advocate for the reduction of
the 36 states to 18. How will this solve the problem of unviability? In order
to address the question of unviability, we need to examine why states were
created in the first place. We had four regions before the creation; the North,
East, West and Mid-West. The conversion of the regions into states and the
creation of the first 12-state structure in 1967 was not based on economic
viability, need for better governance or demand of the people. It was a fall-out
of the post-coup politics and essentially, to under-cut the secession bid of
the East.
The ensuring multiplication of states to 36, is an untidy mess; states were created more as political patronage and an attempt to get a greater share of the national cake. New states were created depending on who had clout in the ruling military regimes, and which groups are to be appeased or compensated. Powerful people even got state capitals located in their backyards or in those of their in-laws. There was no interest in their viability or productivity; they were essentiality, a bureaucracy to share offices and national resources. Same principle accounts for the creation of 774 local governments Given this reality, I am at a loss why Chief Akande thinks a reduction to an 18-state structure is the solution. If the issue of state viability is to be tackled seriously, why does the West which has the same language, culture, progenitor and is geographically contiguous, need multiple states? Why shouldn’t Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Ekiti and Ondo constitute one state or political entity as they were under the leadership of Chiefs Obafemi Awolowo and Ladoke Akintola?Enugu , Anambra, Imo, Abia
and Ebonyi states are like the West, linguistically and culturally homogeneous
and geographically contiguous; why can’t they be one state? What stops Niger , Sokoto, Kebbi, Zamfara, Kaduna ,
Kano and Jigawa
being one state? Why can’t the South-South be a single state? Why shouldn’t the
North Central and North East be one state or at most two? If states are so
merged, then the present states will be local government areas or provinces
catered for from the accounts of their states and not from the federation
account.
But this will be possible only if states are productive rather than being a mere sharing mechanism. This leads to Chief Akande’s other suggestion on fiscal federalism in which resources are shared based on derivation, and states live within their means. This is good, except that we live in an ABDULISTIC society. Abdul is that loafing character in some myths who desires the best things in life without working. We are addicted to such life; and like the cocaine addict, we need to wean ourselves. However, as we know, the normal drug addict does not see the need for rehabilitation until he is on death’s doorstep.
Check the Nigerian Pilot for the full story.
At his seventy seventh birthday this January, he addressed the current issue of non-payment of wages by half of the states in the country. The solution he said is for unviable states to cease to exist or be merged with viable ones. He did not explain how the issue of unpaid salaries will be solved if debtor states cease to exist. Will the workers also cease to exist; disappear or such states will file for bankruptcy and the wages will be part of the liabilities?
When he suggested that unviable states should be merged with viable ones, I wonder how many states are really viable outside
The ensuring multiplication of states to 36, is an untidy mess; states were created more as political patronage and an attempt to get a greater share of the national cake. New states were created depending on who had clout in the ruling military regimes, and which groups are to be appeased or compensated. Powerful people even got state capitals located in their backyards or in those of their in-laws. There was no interest in their viability or productivity; they were essentiality, a bureaucracy to share offices and national resources. Same principle accounts for the creation of 774 local governments Given this reality, I am at a loss why Chief Akande thinks a reduction to an 18-state structure is the solution. If the issue of state viability is to be tackled seriously, why does the West which has the same language, culture, progenitor and is geographically contiguous, need multiple states? Why shouldn’t Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Ekiti and Ondo constitute one state or political entity as they were under the leadership of Chiefs Obafemi Awolowo and Ladoke Akintola?
But this will be possible only if states are productive rather than being a mere sharing mechanism. This leads to Chief Akande’s other suggestion on fiscal federalism in which resources are shared based on derivation, and states live within their means. This is good, except that we live in an ABDULISTIC society. Abdul is that loafing character in some myths who desires the best things in life without working. We are addicted to such life; and like the cocaine addict, we need to wean ourselves. However, as we know, the normal drug addict does not see the need for rehabilitation until he is on death’s doorstep.
Check the Nigerian Pilot for the full story.
Comments
Post a Comment