REVEALED: How banks, govt officials aided marketers to loot subsidy billions
. . And they are all walking
away
*EFCC double standards exposed!
Impunity twerked naked at the market
square. It is still not done twerking.Thousands of forged documents ,
outlandish fairy tales, pervasive
conscience searing mendacity . The whole of an annual federal capital budget
plundered by a few. Noises were made, scapegoats whipped out and paraded in
courts, backdoor negotiations were held at night. Many made away with their
loot ,smiling and twerking or rather gyrating.
Some say it is their luck. Many had
metamorphosed into ‘transformation ambassadors’. Others now mount rostrums,
exponents of the grass to grace phenomenon. A few plotted to govern their
states. And why wouldn’t they? Government officials whose gross
incompetence and willful negligence can only be explained by sleaze induced
criminal conspiracy did not get even a mere rebuke.
Some were promoted. Before long, the
grand criminal enterprise resumed, operators and regulators were allowed to
continue what they hadn’t finished before they were apparently rudely interrupted
– milking the country.
And how can you charge a man for
forging a bill of lading, for forging form ‘M’, for manufacturing documents of
fictitious vessel and stealing billions of naira in the process and yet you
turn around the very following week and award the accused the largest crude
lifting contract in the land? The prosecutors got the message.
2011 subsidy surpasses 8 years
subsidy
In 2011 the nation spent more on
fuel subsidy than it did in the entire eight years of Obasanjo’s leadership.
The finance minister was same Ngozi Okonjo Iweala . She knew what real subsidy
figures should look like . She was not perturbed. Or was she? No one resigned
in righteous anger. Sophistries were regurgitated to explain the phenomenon,
the aberration, its normality.
The economy was expanding rapidly
they claimed, so the dramatic rise in fuel imports and subsidy payments could
be explained. They lied. They brandished their their tales as cudgels so that
any one who had a contrary opinion became an enemy of the government. Until the
riots that pricked the house of representatives, who waded into the matter, and
opened many cans of worms.
Large scale fraud crafted at the
highest levels was perpetuated by government agencies, banks and hundreds of
companies and persons . Goats were invited into the barn, they ate to their
fill and strutted away with swagger , with yams loaded on their backs. People
awoke to the revelation with their ‘tufiakwas’ . “ O lorun maje “ we had all
screamed . Before long all the noises died down, we resumed our slumber.
They say we have a collective social
pathology – amnesia. Those of them who were unlucky to have been charged to
court , the sacrificial lambs, have the benefit of a reluctant prosecution and
fatiguing state witnesses and the near omnipotence of plenty money . State
witnesses have started disowning the earlier statements and affidavits. Time
and money have a way of wearing out the resolve of such witnesses.
It’s four years and interests and
moral resolves are dying or even dead. After 10 years as state witness no one
could remember what versions of Sgt Rogers testimonies and recants was on the
table in that long drawn out case involving Al Mustapha. Many who
committed sacrileges, stole tons and billions of naira in collusion with
federal agencies and principals of the state in broad day light have walked
away. Case files thoroughly messed up. Strange and curious bargains reached
with the EFCC on repatriation of stolen funds.
The public has been left out. No one
knows who is returning what and what has been returned. What was once a public
scandal, aired soap opera is now neatly shrouded in government mystery. We were
told more would be charged to court , that the cases were being filed in
phases. We now know better. Deals have now been struck .
How many have been charged ? And how
did the prosecution select whom to charge and whom to bargain with since
persons who committed similar offences have not been treated alike? Shouldn’t
such bargains be plea bargains? If the Jonathan presidency constituted an
albatross for investigators and prosecutors, are they still bound now? Are
their hands still tied? Is the perfidy irreversible?
Nigerians resist Jonathan’s plan to
check the monster he created
2012 began with an uprising against
the attempt by the Jonathan’s government to withdraw subsidy on petrol. By the
end of 2011 subsidy payments had literally destroyed the nation’s economy.
Jonathan and company knew why and how the subsidy monster was created and
unleashed on the people . Ordinary Nigerians were unaware of the damage that
had been done and ignorantly resisted Jonathan who tried to rein in the monster
he had unleashed.
Jonathan assumed the presidency
after Yaradua’s demise . He had been everything in politics but he was
politically unschooled. He had been catapulted to the top fortuitously , never
prosecuted his own election before 2011. Against a north for whom Yaradua’s
death could not mean a return of power to the south, Jonathan’s dream of
running in 2011 was headed into strong political headwinds. Without clout,
without personal political structures, without charm and charisma, Jonathan
would have to buy and rent. Close presidential aides decided money could
guarantee everything.
The Petroleum subsidy fund was
created in 2006 and was structured to pool funds from the three tiers of
government to cushion the prices of petroleum products. The burden was to fall
50:25:25 on the federal, state and local governments. The states and local
governments looked away and the federal government winked at the petroleum
ministry and the NNPC and all hell broke loose. If the guideline of the scheme
that stipulated the publication of monthly accounts had been followed then
perhaps state governors would have been jolted out of their attitude in good
time. Perhaps ignorance isn’t always bliss after all.
FG increases fuel importers from six
to 140
In 2006 the country had just 5 fuel
importers plus NNPC under the scheme but by the end of 2011, when the filth had
hit the fan , the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) had a
list of 140 companies who had been given import allocations and who had
collected subsidy payments. Necessity they say is the mother of all inventions,
good or bad.
The presidency needed money to prosecute
the 2011 elections and the guidelines that restricted participants in the
scheme to only depot owners had to be sacrificed. The door to the barn was
deemed too small. They wanted to empower indigenous marketers , they claimed.
They always had good reasons to cloak their evil motives.
The hard times for banks and oil
marketers
The subsidy scam met other
exigencies. 2008/2009 was a horrendous time for banks and oil marketers. The
world economic collapse and the sharp drop in oil prices had crippled many oil
trading companies and left huge holes in the books of banks. So for many of
these companies and banks, morality could as well wait. As more entrants came
and the stakes got higher, strategies and stratagems changed and changed until
caution became a hindrance and was discarded altogether.
They went from the bold to the
audacious to the down right ridiculous. It’s safe to think that they never
imagined the forged papers they submitted would ever be dug up. Initially the
vessels were off loaded into storage tanks and back-loaded into other vessels a
couple of days after and sold offshore Cotonou or Togo. But later, even that
became unnecessary wahala. Import nothing, don’t even bother procuring foreign
exchange, those motions became unnecessary. Just forge everything and give
everybody his “due” and dance to your billions in the bank.
A nation that does not plan is a
nation destined for disaster. And without data not only can one not plan , his
barns are vulnerable to leaders whom ambition have turned into scoundrels. We
have a bureau of statistics that does not know how much petrol we consume
daily. It is a key defence data but the military wouldn’t know either. Paucity
of data makes the nation vulnerable in many ways.
Any petroleum minister can instigate
and supervise unrestrained importation of petroleum products in place of a full
blown fund raising bazaar. At some point marketers were asked to just deposit
money, preferably in billions, and they were given allocations and contracts to
recoup later and swim in profit. Little wonder the expo carried on even after
the conclusion of the 2011 elections.
With six companies importing in 2006
the nation spent about 261 billion on petroleum subsidy. In 2007, 10 companies
were engaged and total subsidy figures were about 278 billion naira. In 2008 we
had 19 companies and we spent 346 billion on subsidy. The drama began in 2010 ,
after Yaradua. And by the end of 2011 we had 140 companies , it had become an
all comers affairs.
Politicians turn middlemen for
import allocations
As government fuel importers
mushroomed, the demands made on them before they could be given allocations
skyrocketed. The allocations were given by PPPRA but the ministry of petroleum
resources practically wrote the list. At some point before the 2011 elections
marketers wanting allocations for 15,000 metric tonnes of PMS parted with as
much as one million dollars. And the money had to be paid in dollars. Little
wonder the presidential committee set up in the wake of the subsidy brouhaha
discovered that companies that had not been
pre-qualified and registered by the
PPPRA also received allocations. Registrations and applications were
inconsequential formalities, dollar deposit was the main act. Prominent
government officials and big politicians became middlemen and hawkers of
allocations. Was the Presidency’s focus on the nation’s daily needs? The
PPPRA allowed companies to import fuel so much in excess of the countries
requirements.
And since the profit in bringing in
15,000metric tones at the time could not have been more than 300,000 dollars
and marketers were made to part with about a million dollars in advance, in
bribes, marketers got the message that the government was not interested in
genuine transactions.
Apart from bribes making the cost
benefit calculations impossible, logistical limitations didn’t help constrain
the feelings that “deals” had become inevitable. Vessels were on interminable
queues and tanks were filled, there was a massive glut yet more and more
allocations were churned out. NNPC on its part spent billions in demurrage
costs.
Involvement of the banks
Many banks trampled on extant
financial regulations with impunity in the course of those transactions. Many
others worked hand in hand with the marketers in the criminal enterprise. Some
even helped customers doctor their accounts statements when investigations
started. But all have walked away. Their sullied reputations ostensibly intact.
But why did many of the banks participate so actively in the fraud?
Writhing from the pains of the
economic recession of 2008 and the collapse of the stock and oil markets to
which many of them where heavily exposed , the banks were riddled with bad
debts. AMCON was in the process of cleaning them but the consequences of the
sort of provisioning that CBN demanded was enormous . And we know Nigerian
banks . When the push comes to shove, everything becomes permissible.
So you had a situation where many so
called reputable banks received subsidy payments on behalf of customers who
opened no form “M”s . In some outrageous instances some banks opened LCs for
marketers in favour of international traders supposedly for the importation of
petrol .
But a few days/weeks later the same
customers received inflows of nearly same amount from the same foreign traders
or poorly identified foreign sources. Cargo had been resold to the seller by
the supposed buyer. The banks feigned ignorance. But the money laundering laws
place a duty on them to know the sources and reasons of such huge inflows. The
Financial Intelligence Unit exists but you wonder what they really do.
Then the rogue marketers sent in
counterfeit documents and conjured approvals to support applications for fuel
subsidy for cargoes they did not import. They will nominate their banks , as it
is the practice, to receive the subsidy payment. The Banks received billions
from the CBN for transactions they should have known and did know were
fictitious. The duty the money laundering act places on banks cannot be
satisfied by a plea of ignorance. Many of the banks colluded with their
customers to defraud the nation and not a single bank chief executive was
charged and not a single bank was blacklisted and not a single bank was
punished. Now, that is impunity.
The presidential committee on
subsidy had two prominent and reputable bank chief executives as chairman and
secretary . They did a wonderfully detailed and meticulous job . But how did
banks and officials that connived with these people to bleed the treasury
escape sanctions?
And where was the CBN ?
The CBN governor then , the Emir of
Kano, shouted himself hoarse as the nations’ subsidy payments ballooned. By the
end of 2010 Sanusi was going literally berserk. But did he do enough? I don’t
think so. He should have resigned. NNPC learnt to deduct its own subsidy
payments from crude costs. Yes, they wouldn’t even wait for the CBN. There was
a budgetary allocation for subsidy but no one was really constrained by those
formalities.
But there was more. The CBN paid
marketers who had not sourced any foreign exchange to import fuel. If it were
more vigilant it could have declined the payments until such marketers proved
their sources of funds. The CBN helped the investigations by the various
committees with copious evidence , exposing many fraudulent marketers . Very
good but not enough.
Many will wonder why the CBN which
was the only agency that was altruistically enthusiastic of bringing those
involved to book and stemming the subsidy leakages did not investigate and
punish erring banks and their managements. The CBN failed woefully in that
respect. But its not late to make amends.
THE PPPRA – A regulatory or thieving
agency?
Under the PSF scheme the PPPRA is
the agency to regulate the importation and pricing of petroleum products. It is
supposed to collect data, prequalify and register marketers , decide on the
volume to be imported and allocate import quotas to marketers. The PPPRA is
mandated by law to monitor imports’ arrival , documentation, verification,
certification, storage and distribution. It is supposed to work out under
recovery or over recovery costs.
The PPPRA under the weight of
executive influence and manipulation from above and heavy monetary inducement
and pull from below collapsed and abdicated its responsibilities. And
surrendered wholeheartedly to temptation and filth . The PPPRA deliberately
dismantled the hedges of the barn and joined in its despoliation. They relaxed
the requirements for registration in 2010 and in many instances handed out
allocations to companies that were not even registered.
In the words of the House of Reps
committee that investigated the subsidy scam, PPPRA engaged in a series of
abuses of due diligence process. Their actions were fraught with a glaring lack
of transparency and deliberate opacity. In sum , according to the committee ,
there existed a synergistic criminal enterprise between the operators and the
regulators.
For
the full story, check the Vanguard newspaper.
Comments
Post a Comment