Fuel subsidy: To stay or to go


According to reports, the federal government would remove fuel subsidy this year and Nigerians have been divided over the issue. CHIOMA IRUKE sought the opinion of some citizens on this controversial topic.
Recently, fuel subsidy has generated controversy in the country. The demand that it should be removed has been greeted with mixed reactions from Nigerians, as some believe that it would have a devastating effect on middle and low income earners. Though this fact might not be disputed, but others believe that it would enable the government invest the money spent on subsidy into more meaningful projects.
Nigeria is Africa’s largest oil producer, but still imports refined petroleum products. The country produces about 2.4 million barrels of crude oil daily, which is exported to be refined abroad; this is due to years of corruption and neglect resulting in domestic refineries being non-functional. As a consequence, Nigeria imports 70 percent of its gasoline (about 250,000bpd of petroleum products are imported into the country for sale to its citizens)
On January 1, 2012, the then President, Goodluck Jonathan, announced that fuel subsidy had been removed. This announcement was received with protest and strike by Nigerians led by the Nigerian Labour Congress, NLC. The protest was characterised by civil disobedience, civil resistance, strike, demonstrations and online activism. As a result, the president revoked his decision.
Currently, President Muhammadu Buhari has also been requested to remove fuel subsidy by a former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, and now the Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, and other concerned Nigerians.
According to the emir, the practice is unsustainable because there is a high level of corruption in the subsidy regime, the inefficiency of subsidising consumption instead of production, leading to slower economic growth and the fact that the government borrows money to finance it which means taxing future generations so that Nigerians can consume more fuel.
Sanusi and other economists also believe that subsidy is heavily biased in favour of the middle and upper class who use most of the fuel. Additionally, some people purchase the subsidised gas in Nigeria to resell in other West African countries.
With the reactions of Nigerians on the attempt by the previous administration to remove subsidy, one would wonder how Nigerians see this same suggestion by the emir.
Among those who have reacted to the seeming controversy surrounding the subsidy regime is a journalist at the African Broadcasting Network, ABN, Mr. Temi Akuirene, who agrees with the former central bank governor. Akuirene said: “Yes I believe that subsidy should be removed because it costs the government too much and the citizens do not benefit from it due to the cabal. Government continues paying for subsidy which leaves the country in great debts. If it is removed we would buy at the same cost of production.”
But Mr. Nikki Adima has a contrary opinion, he said: “First of all we should ask ourselves, is there still subsidy? If indeed there is subsidy then I don’t think it should be removed because it would put a lot of pressure on the poor and middle class. At least now that the economy is challenging I don’t think it should be removed.”


 

 

Check the Nigerian Pilot newspaper for the full story.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 World Most Eloquent People

St. Finbaar’s College, Akoka wins the annual Helmbridge Science Challenge for secondary schools in Lagos State.

BIAFRA: IPOB, MASSOB shut down markets, Uwazuruike expelled