Zamfara: Supreme Court Upholds Yari's Election

The Supreme Court has upheld the election of Abdulazeez Abubakar Yari of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as Governor of Zamfara State.

In a unanimous decision, a five-man panel of the court dismissed the appeal by the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the election, Mahmud Aliyu Shinkafi.
The court also upheld the arguments of lawyer to Yari and the APC, Mahmud Magaji (SAN).
In a lead judgment read by Justice John Inyang Okoro, the court resolved the two issues in the appeal against the appellants (Shinkafi and PDP).
It then awarded N100, 000 cost against the appellants and in favour of Yari and his party.
On their complaint that Yari was not qualified to contest the election on the ground that he did not emerge from a valid primary, the court held that the appellants, not being members of the APC or participants in the primary, lacked the locus to challenge the outcome of the primary.
On the second issue of alleged over-voting, the court held that the appellants "failed woefully" to prove their allegation of over-voting.
Justice Okoro held thus: "All I have said above is that the appellants had no locus standi to challenge the election or nomination of the 1st respondent by his political party, the APC at its primary election of December 4, 2014. The simple reason being that they were not aspirants at the said primary election.
"According to Section 87(9) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as ammended) only an aspirant, who participated in a primary election can challenge it's outcome. The provision is restrictive.
"From the findings above, I agree with the court below that the appellants failed woefully to prove over-voting in accordance with the principles laid down by law.
"The reliance on the evidence of DW1, through a document he did not make has not made any difference.
"There is no doubt that a petitioner is entitled to contend that an election or return in an election be invalidated by reason of corrupt practices or non-compliance with the provisions of the Electoral Act.
"For a petitioner to succeed on this ground, he has to prove (a): that the corrupt or non-compliance took place: (b): that the corrupt practice or non-compliance substantially affected the result of the election.
"There is need for a petitioner, who alleges over-voting to lead concrete evidence to show that there was indeed over-voting and that it inured to the winner of the contest.



Check This Day newspaper for the full story.












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 World Most Eloquent People

How lust for girlfriend lured wanted Dimka to Afikpo

Secrets of happy marriage? Respect, celebrate each other —Uma Ukpai